I don't see what the problem is. If you have a hard time to remember what you have downloaded then do this maybe. If you have several videos of a model then make a folder named after her, and relocate all the files to that folder! This will help you organize your files better, don't leave them scattered wondering what you have downloaded or not downloaded already. This is all on you as a leecher to figure out, yea sometimes it helps if the OP adds more additional info about the things he uploads but be glad that you get to download premium files that the uploader has paid for, all for free!!!
Really wish posters would say when something is a repost/old
- Thread starter Stonegarden
- Start date
Finding the old videos isn't the problem, it's having to go through them to see if the "new" video's 2-3 screenshots match up to any. This could be eliminated by the words Repost or Reup.
VolponView
New member
For cam caps, simply put the date on the video, but that's not always known. The best solution is to put a time stamp on the video. It is very rare for two videos of a models to be exactly the same number of minutes and seconds long. It's the only way I can tell them apart when it's a model I like and I have hundreds of their videos.
Someone mentioned KT-SO above, i'll use her as an example. I have 16 folders for different kinds of content from different sites she's been on. A quick look through the bigger folders shows 400+ videos. When a "new" video is posted called "Hot Topless" with a few closeup screencaps of her boobs, with no other information, how am I to know if I have it already? It's not that i'm complaining, i'm just asking for a little more info be posted with the links.
Someone mentioned KT-SO above, i'll use her as an example. I have 16 folders for different kinds of content from different sites she's been on. A quick look through the bigger folders shows 400+ videos. When a "new" video is posted called "Hot Topless" with a few closeup screencaps of her boobs, with no other information, how am I to know if I have it already? It's not that i'm complaining, i'm just asking for a little more info be posted with the links.
Stonegarden
New member
I am amazed at how much resistance there is to just adding the words "This is a re-up" to a repost.
Keep those suggestions coming, though. It's great to see how other people feel about such a simple topic and how polarizing it is.
Keep those suggestions coming, though. It's great to see how other people feel about such a simple topic and how polarizing it is.
VolponView
New member
Simply adding "re-up" does nothing to identify the video. You are assuming that everybody has every video that is uploaded the "first" time.
I fully understand why the posters have to jack up the name of the video or the models name to keep the white knights in check. Date and length of the content is the best way to ID a video.
Keeping them all in one thread (for the Internet Models section at least) is also a wonderful way for us and the uploader to know if they have already uploaded that video too. I agree on time length and file size of course, I'd love to have that info on every upload, but I'd be satisfied with the baby steps of not having to search through 87 threads all devoted to a single video for the same model.
Even taking the malicious intent I am often quick to assume when I see those kinds of posts out of the equation, and assuming it is all innocent and above board, it sure would make the board a lot easier to browse if it didn't have 5 posts on the first page all dedicated to KT-SO, from the same uploader no less, for example. Add to that the difficulty of figuring out if I already have them or not, and I think it should be evident why we're asking for just a little bit of compromise. Because right now I'm simply not even going to look at those threads, much less download anything from them, which again doesn't help anybody.
Even taking the malicious intent I am often quick to assume when I see those kinds of posts out of the equation, and assuming it is all innocent and above board, it sure would make the board a lot easier to browse if it didn't have 5 posts on the first page all dedicated to KT-SO, from the same uploader no less, for example. Add to that the difficulty of figuring out if I already have them or not, and I think it should be evident why we're asking for just a little bit of compromise. Because right now I'm simply not even going to look at those threads, much less download anything from them, which again doesn't help anybody.
Stonegarden
New member
My mistake is assuming that a new thread posting something without a date or "this is a re-up" is a new post.
I think it could be argued that the re-posts to new threads violate forum Posting rule #3: Search before posting to avoid duplicating an earlier post.
VonRaschke
New member
Interesting, I provided the original cam date and file name for a Baily Knox camshow and my post was deleted. On what planet could my comment not be helpful for anyone? What a sad precedent to set, and basically confirms oggy's nefarious intentions with his posts. So disappointing. 
oggy90
New member
Guys, I have a lot of requests to repost videos & sets, but some videos are undated in my collection, if I posted an undated video please send me PM with date and I will add it to my post, no need to post it in my thread please! thanks and enjoy friends!Interesting, I provided the original cam date and file name for a Baily Knox camshow and my post was deleted. On what planet could my comment not be helpful for anyone? What a sad precedent to set, and basically confirms oggy's nefarious intentions with his posts. So disappointing.
VonRaschke
New member
Not true at all. You downloaded the cam originally from UltimateWanker on this very site at http://kitty-kats.net/threads/bailey-knox-webcam-show-9-september-2014.2194669/ when he originally posted it here, then deliberately changed the filename and re-uploaded it on your account, then after I made a post to provide the original cam date you reported my post because you were afraid you would get less downloads had you been honest. Shameful.
oggy90
New member
good "thank you" for free new and old stuff, which you download from month to month on my links.. interesting story Detective.. Think as you like.. it's your opinion
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes! And you also need enough comments or "thanks" before you have cred.I personally think they should just re-up it in the original thread and bump that thread. But I guess by making a new thread each time, it increases their post count.
But I don't share content so my opinion matters little
D4FTcrunk
New member
I love and appreciate all Oggy's posts... but I must concur with this. The "I didn't know the date" excuse is simply not valid when you click on the screenshot and see it in the filename of the pics there. Not only that, a couple months back I discovered that one post contained screenshots from at least 2 different cam shows, I can't help but feel this is intentionally misleading. I've bitten my tongue on this issue in the past, because I wouldn't want some poster rage quitting or blaming "haters" and stopping their uploads altogether. But let's call this what it is: premium filehost rewards clickbaiting. I now have to check my entire collection across 2 different drives every time an undated cam sesh is uploaded here... and it turns out that 95% of the time, I already had it. Some just omit the filename completely, some are merely .flv to .mp4 conversions. Again, I don't really mind the practice and won't complain about free porn, and it's still good for those who missed the posts in the past, agreed... but let's just call this what it is and be honest about it please! There is no legitimate reason to omit the original file date/name when you have it, other than to deceive people who already downloaded it into downloading it again.Interesting, I provided the original cam date and file name for a Baily Knox camshow and my post was deleted. On what planet could my comment not be helpful for anyone? What a sad precedent to set, and basically confirms oggy's nefarious intentions with his posts. So disappointing.
Last edited by a moderator:
VonRaschke
New member
I don't download your files because I already downloaded them in the past from other Kitty-Kats members. They get my thanks, and with your attitude and seedy actions you'll never get a single one from me.
oggy90
New member
OK thanks.. but KK is not only for you don't forget
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know why you are complaining but frankly everyone has been doing this for years. There's always one who buys a clip / caps it and then uploads it, and then afterwards leechers download it and decide to go elsewhere and upload it there and make a thread on another forum. But let's be real now. Oggy90 is the only one to share Brittany Marie and Sherri content of their websites and he's buying their clips in IWC etc.. sharing it for people who don't have to pay 20-50 bucks per clip, all for free for everyone to enjoy. If you wanna point fingers at people for downloading other ppls stuff and taking credit for it then you have missed out on a lot, I've had many files in the past that have been "reuploaded" by others, even though I was the one who purchased it originally, I can't complain it's part of the internet so no point in bitching about it tbh.
Just curious, but why can't you complain about it? And additionally, why wouldn't you? Maybe if more people complained it would happen less. Maybe not, but why give up before even trying?
Listen, I appreciate content providers as much as anyone else, and without them we truly wouldn't have anything, but when behavior becomes a trend, why not say something about it? Even if it doesn't change anything, it at least provides information so that others can decide if they really want to support an individual who is doing something they don't agree with. It seems readily apparent to many of us why certain practices are being continued, but perhaps we are all wrong. It would go a long way to changing our minds if we got more of a reasoning than what we've seen though. And saying it isn't worth complaining about just perpetuates the problem.
Also, if Oggy90 is actually buying all of those Brittany Marie and Sherri videos and sharing them because he likes sharing, well then good for him. I'd guess that he isn't buying them, and is instead getting them through other sources, but I have no proof of this other than his behavior here to go off of, so maybe I'm wrong. Either way, yes he is providing it to us, and I do appreciate that. Sure, I'd love it if he didn't start a GD new thread for every single new and reposted video, but I do realize he's still providing a service that myself and others get benefit from.
That still doesn't mean that we can't all work together to make everything even more satisfactory to everyone though, right?
Sheester
New member
Yes. Key word here is "more" satisfactory, because as the saying goes, you can't please everyone all the time, right?
I can kinda see why some people are cheezed about it, and I can also see why others would chide people for "complaining about free stuff." I've downloaded plenty of files only to realize I've already downloaded them in the past. It goes with the territory, and it's easy for me to say, "So what?" because it took anywhere from 30 seconds to 5 minutes to download from a host I've already paid to join. So it's not really "free" but it also isn't something I consider a nuisance. Usually I just blame myself for not noticing. But if someone is using the free download and it takes hours to download only to realize that 1) you already have it and 2) now you have to wait X amount of time before your next download or whatever the limits are, I imagine that sucks. And I'm sure it's disappointing and/or a nuisance for other reasons that I don't consider...
Some people share for fun, and others share to make or profit (or at least get their money back for buying the content they share). Years ago I used to share occasionally, and I was too lazy and/or dumb to ever figure out how to make it pay. I've shared files in the past (paid, CTOC, and OC) that hit four-figure downloads each and I never saw a dime, nor did I ever care to figure that part out. I only mention that because I rarely see issues like this through the lens of "misleading people to make money," but I suppose that does happen.
It's annoying to download something I already have, especially if the title or post led me to believe it was new. But it doesn't cost me anything on top of what I already pay for premium membership. And YES, it would be easy for posters to provide more info about their files, so I'm glad someone is bringing this issue up, but does it really warrant anger directed to posters who are, at the end of the day, providing a service for everyone? It's not helpful to say, "If you don't like it, buy a premium!
" Nor is it helpful to accuse someone of being a jerk by intentionally misleading them. Hopefully now that this points has been raised we'll see some positive changes. And if you don't know if something is new or old, PM the poster. If he doesn't reply, now you can call him a jerk
.VonRaschke
New member
That's a whole other can of worms that you're talking about. The lack of respect to other kitty-kats members is what irks me. Re-uploading files that have long since been deleted/taken down is fine. Deliberately changing the file names for no good reason is not. As others have said above, a lot of this would be avoided if people posted their re-uploaded links in the original thread (we have a search function on here that works well, why not use it?), but unfortunately I know the answer as to why they don't: ego. They want their own thread for their own links, and in many cases for content they downloaded here from other kitty-kats members with no credit to the original poster because, again, ego. I'm not going to get into anything about other websites and forums because that veers into "internet police" type of territory, but it really does hurt the community here when you have posters stepping over others just to make more money. This sort of behavior just pushes out "the little guys" of the community. Face it, everyone has money and everyone can make whatever sacrifice, big or small, to buy a membership or to buy a zip set, but when you let "power users" that devote their time to uploading files they downloaded to their premium filehosting account with such determination that it's almost like a job for them then it only drives away future and past contributors at the expense of a handful of people that just want to make money. That brings me back to the key point in all of this: community. This is about a lack of respect for the community here, and that makes me sad because I remember when it wasn't like this.
CheeksMcButt
New member
Some of you are just being punks at this point. Oggs posts stuff with free links, unlike a large chunk of the people here which have decided to do premium-only... including board staff, which against the site's rules.