Shouldn't domination type content go in the fetish section?
- Thread starter Lazarus
- Start date
Lazarus
New member
I was just going to let this thread die, but, since someone responded... 
For me, I think there's a difference between a Tara Tainton type performance where she's role-playing as a dominating female but otherwise still engages in sexual behavior and/or nudity that would be considered exciting to a normal hetrosexual male. That is the kind of material I think you're classifying as tame role-playing and I'm okay with that.
What I'm calling out is the content where some chick is non-nude the whole video and engaging in humiliating talk. That's about as appealing to me as gay porn.
Everyone has their own taste in women, and so I may click on a thread and see giant fake tits and say that's not for me. But, at least I know me and the poster are both on the same wavelength and if someone were to find my browsing history, no big deal.
But, when I click on a thread and see it's targeted at some guy who gets his kicks off being submissive and humiliated and told to eat his own cum, that's not something I just say, "hmmm... nah, not in the mood today, maybe tomorrow" and it's not something I'd want someone to see on my browsing history. It's a totally different sexual preference that seems to belong in a different section.
But, there's not been a whole lot of response supporting my position, and I've been kind of surprised by that, so perhaps my tastes are more unique than I think.
For me, I think there's a difference between a Tara Tainton type performance where she's role-playing as a dominating female but otherwise still engages in sexual behavior and/or nudity that would be considered exciting to a normal hetrosexual male. That is the kind of material I think you're classifying as tame role-playing and I'm okay with that.
What I'm calling out is the content where some chick is non-nude the whole video and engaging in humiliating talk. That's about as appealing to me as gay porn.
Everyone has their own taste in women, and so I may click on a thread and see giant fake tits and say that's not for me. But, at least I know me and the poster are both on the same wavelength and if someone were to find my browsing history, no big deal.
But, when I click on a thread and see it's targeted at some guy who gets his kicks off being submissive and humiliated and told to eat his own cum, that's not something I just say, "hmmm... nah, not in the mood today, maybe tomorrow" and it's not something I'd want someone to see on my browsing history. It's a totally different sexual preference that seems to belong in a different section.
But, there's not been a whole lot of response supporting my position, and I've been kind of surprised by that, so perhaps my tastes are more unique than I think.
*shrug* I agree with you Lazarus, but I think the categories are inclusive instead of excluding. If she is a camgirl doing it, she can be posted in fetish or camgirl sections. If it is an internet model, fetish or internet model sections.
Honestly people should be identifying that sort of content in the thread, but posting stuff is a pain in the ass as it is, so I can understand if it gets left out.
Honestly people should be identifying that sort of content in the thread, but posting stuff is a pain in the ass as it is, so I can understand if it gets left out.
