Sad but true. it reminds me of teh old saying shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted.It's all about the money man. They wont get rid of their cash cows, like Ginger, Kick, Honey, TKO and a whole bunch of others that cam out in public all the time. If the model brings in the cash, the cheek gets turned. Just like everywhere else in life. Money talks, bullshit walks.
As I said before Library shows and public shows this counts as illegal activity as it is considered public nudity and a crime in most countries and therefore against MFC rulesI guess they haven't banned all public shows. Jessie125 was just doing a library show today. I guess mfc is relaxing the rules again.
I don't think they're relaxing their rules, just unaware of her continuing to do these types of shows IMO.I guess they haven't banned all public shows. Jessie125 was just doing a library show today. I guess mfc is relaxing the rules again.
If it is the same show that I saw yesterday, the library is actually the bookcase at her place.I guess they haven't banned all public shows. Jessie125 was just doing a library show today. I guess mfc is relaxing the rules again.
I guess they haven't banned all public shows. Jessie125 was just doing a library show today. I guess mfc is relaxing the rules again.
how could she? its way too obvious, to most anyway, that its not a library.Just to say that Jessie has never lied about the location doing her library@home shows. It simply creates a setting to get into her character of shy girl pretending to study, wearing her strict shirt, cardigan, skirt and pantyhose
its not as easy as that. she'd have to find and put the library scene on the blank area. i cant see any model going to THAT much trouble.then put yourself in front of a greenscreen and do a fake library show. Dunno why more models don't do this
plus the owner would be the site not the model regardless. Does no one read the fine print on MFC.webcam content is not copyrighted.
i saw something where MFC says point blank that the shows might be capped, and posted online, in what i think was an add to the agreement/consent/waiver of copyrights form they have to sign. i dont remember if it was a post here, or MFC itself. so it appears MFC dont give a shit.plus the owner would be the site not the model regardless. Does no one read the fine print on MFC.
i dont think they can have the mark on the content unless ...but u may be correct.I thought it was a $2500 for each false dmca report.