Precisely.Or in other words GIGO.
I dunno. I mean, technically, factually, you are correct. But when it comes to frame interpolation, I think there's a human perception aspect as well. While the encoder might not be creating any new frames from real filming, the smoother video creates the perception that it's more "real".If I want to increase the FPS to 60, the video software is going to double the existing framerate. Where will the those 30 additional frames come from? From the existing 30 frames. It isn't magic. It might make some additional interpolation from frame to frame, but if you look at one of those frames they are not magically high quality frames.
Yes, there is the subjective element of what people perceive. When I saw that Grape Milkshake rehashed video, I think I saw it from usenet many years ago, I remember thinking "What's the big deal." It did not blow me away. It was interesting, but I did not perceive it as being a great improvement.I dunno. I mean, technically, factually, you are correct. But when it comes to frame interpolation, I think there's a human perception aspect as well. While the encoder might not be creating any new frames from real filming, the smoother video creates the perception that it's more "real".
One of the more popular videos of this type is "Grape Milkshake," which isn't too hard to find. This camera-stabilized, frame-interpolated to 120fps clip is far, far superior to its parent video, in my opinion. I'd post a GIF here, but in a browser, it can't be viewed at 120fps.
Again, you're right, and it is probably also a DVD made from the inferior re-encoded free downloads. But I doubt they sell 10 DVD's a week.On that note, who is spending $30 on a DVD when it's all available for free?
I think it’s $29.99 for EACH DVD. The 20 movies are listed together but priced separately.I guess I didn't pay attention to the listing----it's 10 DVDs/20 movies for $29.99. I wonder if this person had actual physical DVDs? The movies he's offering are CM43-CM62, which were from the DVD era.
I know nothing about running a website. Christina for sure was and still appears to be very hot. When Christina's website shut down I have to believe that people running other websites new how hot Christina was and the money potential she had to offer. So wouldn't you think some of them would have reached out to Christina with offers to hire her? I mean that guy Phil-Flash that work with Nikki Sims seems like a guy that would jump on any good opportunity to make money. I would guess she got a few calls, but must have turn them away. Like Kris Karson is a model that has jumped from website to website. I would think if Christina really wanted to model she could contact many sites that would pay her a lot of money to model.
Is that another one of those found in the elusive "Serials" videos that aren't available anywhere?Here is another slip that seemed planned cause the camera was focused on that boob for several seconds before it slipped out.
Nope. It is from Christina Model Video (DVD) 106. About 15:48 is where her tit starts to fall out.Is that another one of those found in the elusive "Serials" videos that aren't available anywhere?